Archive for August, 2005

12
Aug

   Posted by: AUDIOMIND   in Random

There are times when it’s hard to know what to say, when the situation is so bleak, the problems so entrenched, that it’s hard to see a way out. The proverbial phrase, “Everything will be all right” sounds hollow, but sometimes it’s the best I can come up with. I confess to a certain tendency to commiserate. I suppose I’ve felt that, having no practical advice to offer, I could at least be sympathetic, and hope that brought some comfort.

But I’ve had to rethink that approach in light of reading about websites endorsing group suicides. Here was well-intentioned sympathy taken to its ultimate conclusion, and it was not helpful. Encouraging and supporting someone in taking his or her own life doesn’t ease the pain of loneliness or depression or uselessness; it validates it. It says, in essence, “You’re right. Your life is pointless. You’ve hit bottom and there’s no way out.” I want no part of that on any level.

There have been times when I’ve dug myself into some pretty deep, dark holes – strained relationships that nearly tore my sanity apart, finances on the brink of bankruptcy, friends whose behavior were spinning out of control.

Looking back, I remember two or three friends whose calm, caring confidence that there was a light at the end of the tunnel brought me hope when I needed it most. They didn’t flippantly dismiss the challenges I was facing. But they didn’t commiserate either. They help me put things into context. They encouraged patience and commitment. Their confidence that there was a way out encouraged me to hope.

“Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil:”
(Ps. 23:4) has taken on deep significance for me, even though I do not necessarily believe in the G.O.D. Though I have my doubts once in a while, I have begun to trust that I am not a failure; and that things are not hopeless; which deepens my understanding, strengthens my character, and turns hardships into stepping-stones to grace.

I think I’ve taken comfort in the idea that the ‘ordeals of life’ aren’t proof that I am a failure as a human being. In time I have come to see that real solutions involve something deeper than just escaping painful consequences. Real solutions require spiritual growth, a deeper understanding of the principles that govern living and a willingness to put these principles into practice.

It would be a shame if the best I could offer the “small and insignificant” were indifference or a tacit validation of their worst fears – that their life has no value and would not be missed. I would like to do much better than that, for their sake and my own…….So, I’ve resolved that there will be no more commiserating.

11
Aug

   Posted by: AUDIOMIND   in Random

my hand on shadowbunnyz yum-yumz…..

11
Aug

   Posted by: AUDIOMIND   in Random

….yet MORE computer problems?

did i mention that i despise NAV, and WINDOWS in particular!!!

fairly sure that NAV-2004, after downloading a .def file from the norton website a couple nights back, seriously screwed my windows/system32 folder up, to the point where i can’t even startup the comp in safe mode.

windows, ie6 and NAV stop at nothing short of causing me constant migraines, instantaneous scream sessions and abdominal pains. perhaps i would be better off with just getting a virus and then using mcafee to clean it or better yet just all together giving up using a computer.

here we find ourselves back at the drawing board…..ONCE AGAIN……only to transfer c: files for hours on end to another hardrive [since the 2nd 60gb d: HD i have is practically filled to the max w/ samples/mp3's/midi], only then to transfer them [copy:paste] back onto a newly formatted and reinstalled c: system that i will have to tweak and mold to my detailed liking…….only then to make even more hardware changes so that i can get back up and running AGAIN ‘smoothly’.

……then i’ll get into installing drivers, system files and [mostly] audio programs…….etc…..etc…..only to waste more hours and days, in the hopes of getting all the settings right.

i’m going back to NAV-2001 [or perhaps even a free alternative that doesn't devastate system resources] and installing mozilla firefox [and not hellish ie6] when i format c: and reinstall windows.

why don’t i get paid for this shit.

9
Aug

Creative Visualization

   Posted by: AUDIOMIND   in Random

The Concept of Creative Visualization

9
Aug

How Motherboards Work

   Posted by: AUDIOMIND   in Random

how computer motherboards function

5
Aug

   Posted by: AUDIOMIND   in Random

Here lies a terrific essay on the damage DRM will do to the marketplace, consumer fair rights and innovation……….and to the long tail.

5
Aug

Maps Forum and Scheduling….

   Posted by: AUDIOMIND   in Random

While visiting the Maps Forum a few days ago, an interesting conversation developed…….

Starting in the early 1980s, the DEA was aware of open sales of Ecstasy in Texas. I’ve always thought that Sen. Lloyd Bentson of Texas brought this matter to the attention of the DEA, but I can find no documentation of that. In any case, the DEA decided to criminalize MDMA and placed a notice in the Federal Register on July 27, 1984 announcing that it would place MDMA in Schedule I in 30 days unless any objections were filed. The underground MDMA therapy community had expected that the DEA would eventually try to criminalize MDMA, and some in the therapeutic community were prepared. A group of reputable scientists and doctors filed objections and went to the DEA headquarters in DC and filed the papers requesting a hearing. The DEA was forced to schedule a hearing……….

How does the DEA go about doing this? Does the DEA receive a directive from the AG? Who and under what circumstances can the DEA be compelled (forced) to hold hearings regarding placing a drug in schedule I. Is this something which must be initiated by a request from a member of a legislative body, or is it by way of executive order? Can the public at large, or members of the general public initiate a request (or demand) for DEA hearings on whether or not to schedule a previously unscheduled drug?

Here is what I do understand…..
The AG does have the power to criminalize drugs, but the AG has subdelegated this power to the DEA. Once the DEA decides to schedule a drug, it has to announce this in the Federal Register. Anyone objecting has 30 days to file an objection and request a hearing. If noone files an objection within 30 days, then the drug gets scheduled, methinks.

Lastly (but more of a philosophical question), wouldn’t this whole process violate the constitutional separation of powers by allowing the executive branch to write (and approve) laws?

On that last point, unfortunately, no. Congress gave the power to schedule specific new drugs to the AG.

One of the main reasons that the process of “writing and approving” laws by the executive branch does not violate the separation of powers is that the DEA (via the mandate of the Attorney General) is an administrative agency. Administrative agencies were created by congress in order to ease day-to-day administration and enforcement of laws under the executive branch. These agencies are basically only subject to their own rules as there is very little power vested within the judiciary to review the agency’s actions with the ‘required’ checks and balances. Honestly, the only way to reverse an agency decision, once made, is to prove that they have violated THEIR OWN written policies. However, there is a process of notice and comment that the agencies must undergo before changing something. The way that the agencies give notice to the people and allow comments to be made is by publishing, via the federal register, proposed changes. This sounds very democratic, but in actual practice it means that in order to gain actual notice, you have to dig through the federal register…which I HIGHLY recommend checking it out sometime if you’re near a legal library, just for kicks. All in all, it’s quite a frustrating endeavor. Consequently, little or no notice is rarely ever given, so only those folks who are deeply entrenched in a subject actually find out about proposed rule-changes.

My point?

Agencies can basically do whatever they want, however they choose, all of the time. Their ability to violate civil liberties knows no bounds. Just google the phrase ‘powers of inquisition’ with respect to administrative agencies. They can violate basic civil liberties under their investigatory power, and they do it ALL THE TIME.

As I’d like to be a public official someday, I’ve reached the end of my public rant.

3
Aug

How an Invisibility Cloak Works

   Posted by: AUDIOMIND   in Random

How an Invisibility Cloak Works

Page 3 of 41234