So what is love?
Rather than talk directly about what I think romantic love is, it might help to begin with some of the misconceptions people (until recently, myself included) commonly have about love. By identifying some things that appear to be obvious misconceptions, we can at least know what love is not, and so get a clearer picture of what it might be.
Misconception 1: Love is a particular kind of feeling.
About 12 years ago [I must be getting old…….aghhhhhhh!], when I was optimistically experimenting with open-relationships, I wrote an essay about what Love was. It seemed obvious to me that love was an emotion, and so goes that love was a feeling, thus it came and went as feelings do. I couldn’t make any sense of the way people talked about Love – as if it was some sort of invisible team jacket that couples would be always wearing, rather than a feeling that would sometimes be there, sometimes go away. And if Love was nothing more than a personal feeling that came and went, then I didn’t see any problems about inducing it with several different people. It also seemed just plain bizarre to morally judge when and where I would have this feeling – after all, it was just a feeling – what did it matter if I felt it in situation X with person Z or situation Y with person W?
The whole traditional story of love was both based on some strange and imaginary conception of what Love was. An open-relationship meant freedom from this illusion, at least to me.
But is that all there is to Love?
We talk about our emotions as if they’re psychological feelings – something that compliments physical feelings (sensations). It just seems obvious to us that they are, and so also that everyone in any culture or historical period would have them, since everyone experiences feelings and they seem to be the same ones.
A quick inspection, however, shows that emotions are actually very different than feelings. For starters, just try to imagine feeling love, without actually being in love. At the most you might say that you feel as if you were love, but it is simply logically impossible to feel love without already being in love. And if you have to be in love before you can feel love, then love must not be a feeling. Moreover, consider the fact that feelings are very brief and can quickly change, while loving someone is something that normally does not. Love is often associated with a “warm and fuzzy” feeling, but no one in love constantly feels warm and fuzzy, and when they don’t, it seems wrong to say that they’re not actually in love at that moment.
Considering this along with the recognition of how much we have at stake with love, we find a danger in thinking of love as a feeling. If we think of love as a feeling, we should very soon conclude that love doesn’t last. If the standard for love we set for our relationship is that it is a particular kind of intense or warm or whatever feeling, and then only see love in our relationships when they give us with a constant stream of this feeling, then we’ll be constantly disappointed by the disappearance of “love” when really it was simply the warm and fuzzies that faded away or occurred less often.
But if love is not a feeling, what is it? Though the details are much in dispute, most philosophers today take love, and most if not all other emotions, to be a type of judgment. My preferred version is of love as a way of seeing the world which involves making certain judgments about it. To make a judgment about something entails having some beliefs about it, or at least about the things surrounding it. It seems to me that to be in love involves just this: to love someone is to see the world in a certain way which grants the loved one a special kind of complex nexus of role-expectations, demands, special permissions, etc. – especially seen from the partial perspective of “us” (the loved and the lover), instead of “me”, as the normal way you see the world. Loving someone entails partly seeing the world as someone who is walking through it together with another person, rather than alone.
That’s my attempt to give a general sketch of what I think what love is. I realize it’s somewhat fuzzy on the one hand, and somewhat predictable on the other – but there it is. I’ll try to flesh it out a little more by pointing out two other misconceptions about love.
Misconception 2: All you need is Love.
Maybe it’s not love’s fault here. Maybe it’s the way marketing affects our society so as to make it seem to us that instant salvation is just around the corner if we buy product X, or land that next promotion, or finally find that one right person to love. I think that most of us have been guilty of honestly thinking that “if we only had X…” then we would have all we need to live a good life, where X was any of these things. But while it’s usually considered a little superficial to say that “all we need” is a promotion or that “all we need” is a new lap-top to make us happy, we usually accept without any question that all we need is love.
It’s neither surprising that so many of us who are not currently in love think this and live our lives as if it were true, nor that virtually no one that is in love would agree with such a beautiful childish fantasy.
Love is hard. Love is demanding. Love is dangerous. Love can you make you very very miserable. Love can make you throw it all away. Love can make it seem as if nothing matters.
These are not the characteristics of failed love, but of lived love. Even the healthiest romantic loves are often all of these things, even while generally making you exuberant, hopeful, secure, passionate – and sometimes love can be several of these things at the same time.
Which leads me to the third misconception I want to talk about……..
Misconception 3: Love is not a feeling, but a type of relationship – a balance of compromises between two people.
Having a good relationship with someone – even your life partner – is very different than being in love with them. It’s easy to confuse the two things because a close relationship involves a complex set of dynamics with someone, while love demands so many accommodations from the lovers that satisfying it by focusing on relationship dynamics often seems like the natural way to satisfy it. But the two are obviously different, and many a fine relationship involves very little romantic love and a whole lot of good companionship, while many terrible relationships involve intense love from both sides. Sometimes the love people have for one another and the practical relationship that they work out between them work out nicely and sometimes they don’t. Sometimes, in fact, it is because of their love that they simply cannot maintain a healthy relationship with one another. Jealousy – a common, expected, and to a limited degree desired aspect of love – is just one common reason love can lead to a failed relationship. Another is the way that close relationships involve things like money, free time, luxuries, and care of children – all of these things have a lot to do with maintaining good relationships and not necessarily anything to do with love, which can undermine them.
If every relationship is hard and requires compromise and negotiation, love can both help, hinder, and complicate the process. And, how well our relationships go can profoundly affect how happy being in love makes us, when, and why. A good relationship doesn’t have to be based on romantic love, but love requires a good relationship in order to have a chance at making us happy. A bad relationship doesn’t need to be based on love either, but it can be, and when it is the results can be just tragic.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
If these misconceptions now seem obvious to you……….well good, they should. If they didn’t, then you’d have reason to suspect that I’m telling you a story about something other than Love. What seems obvious to me, however, is that we don’t live our lives as if they were obvious. The consequence of the general misconceptions about one of the most vital aspects of our lives can be disastrous, even tragic. So where does our notion of Love come from, how much does it really inform us about the real thing, and why does it embody such crucial misconceptions?
……The hardest thing about love is living up to it……