In honor of this post I give you more……..

Bookmark and Share This Entry

Yet another article by a “wish-I-was-a” feminazi biznatch, who hates his own testicles.

Is anyone surprised? I’m not.

The enemy, including most notably PBS and it’s feminazi producers and sycophant eunuchs like Bob Port of the Times Union (NY), justify their own bias by carefully selecting a few cases apparently involving male abuse to extrapolate ALL cases, thus publicly feeding the anti-male, anti-father court bias.

It could make exactly the SAME point AGAINST mothers by carefully selecting a few mother abuse cases to make it’s point.

Notice how the eunuch Port says we need to “trust mothers to be mothers”. Well, if Port and his feminazi queens would get their heads out of the sand and look at government statistics on child abuse and gender incidence this would mean trusting the party who commits the most cases of abuse, not including the stepfathers and boyfriends who perpetrate a significant amount too. Natural fathers are the LEAST likely to commit abuse over the general population (unless of course you use selected examples to generalize).

However, if we were to exonerate fathers, WHO would be feeding the government child support coffers???

Notice, quite glaringly, how they [he] do [does] not have a single respondent discuss his or her horror stories at the hands of an abusive mother, nor provide any factual basis for their claims with statistics/links/etc. Also notice how he (and PBS) parrot the usual feminazi tactics of explaining men’s efforts to obtain custody of their own children in terms of seeking a better financial deal and how they use the amorphous term of “emotional” child abuse against children.

Funny how sadistic horror stories like Andrea Yates gets pushed under the rug, or disregarded entirely, but a man can fart in the wrong direction and his ex will charge abuse.

Andrea Yates, the Texas woman who drowned her 5 children
http://www.chron.com/content/chronicle/special/01/drownings/index.html

Male chauvinism and feminism have formed an evil union and as far as I can see, there is nothing foreseeable in the next several decades that can change it, or their campaign of misandry and propaganda foisted on the public.

The judiciary and public are like conditioned rats when it comes to fathers – it only takes one reinforcement of a strong behaviour (e.g., a story of male abuse) to establish a prejudice that is immune to a thousand rebuttals and forms a strong “perception.” It doesn’t work this way for mothers [a majority of 'custodial parents']. Mothers are sacrosanct no matter what they do (as if the human brain refuses to acknowledge the act in its sensory experience). Fathers are abusive no matter what the facts (the brain refuses to drop its strong prejudice, no matter what the evidence is in front of it). Judges will go out of their way to minimize or even ignore or refuse to believe bad behavior on the part of mothers because it doesn’t conform to their prejudice – - so they continue to make the dad wrong even where the mother is a criminal and the father perfectly fit.

Of course we know that this is not the goal of the documentary…….to make the system fair for all, but to insure mothers always receive custody and the father always be a servant to forced peonage.

The system ONLY works when it works for them.

Don’t you just love their commitment to equal rights and equal protection under the law? Unless it works to their favor, ALL the TIME, it is a screwed up system, not half the time, or even based on an objective standard, which applies equally to all, but a standard wholly and solely based on nothing more than their gender. If this is not a case of extreme bias, I don’t know what the hell is.

So how many people will fall for this BS story?

“You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.”
-Abraham Lincoln (1809–1865)

Btw, here are the real statistics……not shady feminazi #s:

Crime in the United States 2004:
http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius_04/documents/CIUS2004.pdf

Crime statistics for cities with populations above 10,000:
http://wid.ap.org/documents/fbi/ucr2004citylist.pdf

Child Maltreatment Reports
http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/programs/cb/publications/cmreports.htm

———————————————————–

:filth below:

Documentary sheds light on system that lets children suffer at the hands of abusive fathers.

“This week, every judge, lawyer, psychiatrist, psychol social worker with any connection to family law in New York ought to be taken into custody, escorted to their local courthouse and forced to watch “Breaking the Silence: Children’s Stories,” a PBS documentary set to air in the Capital Region at 10 p.m. Thursday on WMHT Ch. 17.”

———————————————————

Honestly, I cannot put anymore of this BS of a story up here, bc I’m getting sick to my stomach…….so just go read the BS yourself……….and bitch smack those who support these lies.

http://www.timesunion.com/forms/emaileditor.asp
http://www.timesunion.com/forms/contactus.asp
http://www.timesunion.com/help/email.asp

Bookmark and Share This Entry

—————————————————————————————————–
It is estimated that piracy costs the entertainment and software industries tens of billions of dollars.
————————————————————————————————-

The concept of pirating has knocked a few ‘linguistical’ screws loose in all impending DRM arguments IMO…….take for instance the 4-3v3r touted preposterous figure above [BS].

The music/software/movie/etc industries !MAY!-[emphasis] not make tens of billions of dollars, but I hardly believe that they “lose” that much. IME and ‘research’, most of the stuff downloaded or bought illegally is generally something a person wouldnt buy anyway, primarily bc of the cost. For instance, people don’t want to spend $80 for a software program, especially if they can download it for free or buy it off some random street vendor guy for 5 bucks.

When that happens, they [the RIAA/MPAA/software vendors/etc] don’t lose $80 because the person never would have bought the software/music/movie in the first place, instead they just didn’t make the $80.

Same thing with CD’s/DVD’s…………

Someone isn’t going to buy a certain CD for 13 bucks, when they can get it for free or for a few bucks. So the artist didn’t necessarily lose $13 because they were never going to make that $$$ in the first place.

So that ‘figure’ above is bloated and full of crap……..regardless of the fact that I do not condone TRUE copyright/patent violations.

Bookmark and Share This Entry

It’s extremely subtle……….I’ve never seen anything like it.

Anyhooz here’s the Hardest Logic Puzzle in the World:

A group of people live on an island. They are all perfect logicians — if a conclusion can be logically deduced, they will do it instantly. No one knows the color of their eyes. Every night at midnight, a ferry stops at the island. If anyone has figured out the color of their own eyes, they [must] leave the island that midnight.

On this island live 100 blue-eyed people, 100 brown-eyed people, and the Guru. The Guru has green eyes, and does not know her own eye color either. Everyone on the island knows the rules and is constantly aware of everyone else’s eye color, and keeps a constant count of the total number of each (excluding themselves). However, they cannot otherwise communicate. So any given blue-eyed person can see 100 people with brown eyes and 99 people with blue eyes, but that does not tell them their own eye color; it could be 101 brown and 99 blue. Or 100 brown, 99 blue, and the one could have red eyes.

The Guru speaks only once (let’s say at noon), on one day in all their endless years on the island. Standing before the islanders, she says the following:

“I can see someone with blue eyes.”

Who leaves the island, and on what night?

[Stipulations]
There are no mirrors or reflecting surfaces, nothing dumb, It is not a trick question, and the answer is logical. It doesn’t depend on tricky wording, and it doesn’t involve people doing something silly like creating a sign language or doing genetics. The Guru is not making eye contact with anyone in particular; she’s simply saying “I count at least one blue-eyed person on this island who isn’t me.”

And lastly, the answer is not “no one leaves.”

some other things to ponder……and finally the answer

Bookmark and Share This Entry

GIMP & Photoshop CS2 together are a fucking great combination.

Sure wish my plugins from Photoshop 7 still worked though [i had a ton of cool ones]……speaking of which, anyone know where I might get any FREE plugins for CS2?

Cheers for that.

Bookmark and Share This Entry