Posts Tagged ‘politics’

Ron Paul Won by a Landslide

Compilation of Congressman Ron Paul at the Fourth GOP Presidential Debate held in the Whittemore Center at the University of New Hampshire on September 5th, 2007. (Note: Giuliani disrespectfully laughs at questions directed at Dr. Paul. Laughter can easily be heard at 5:25 & 3:10 and again with 1:23 remaining:)

Open Letter to Fox News

Wednesday night during the debate Fox News and Sean Hannity displayed an extreme amount of discourtesy and disrespect to not only the Republican Presidential candidates, but the American people as well.

There was a very clear bias towards several individuals on stage. Senator Brownback and Congressman Ron Paul received very little air time in comparison to the other candidates on stage. Rudy Giuliani was allowed much more talk time as well as additional talk time after the bell than any other candidate on stage. The moderator would ask all the candidates their opinion on issues, i.e., taxes or Gitmo, and ignore only Ron Paul’s completely different opinion on those matters. Finally, when the moderator would get around to asking Dr. Paul a question it was a unique one-sided question engineered to make Dr. Paul appear foolish. Furthermore, when the moderator would ask a question of Dr. Paul it seemed as though Rudy Giuliani’s microphone was purposefully turned up so that he could be heard snickering at the question. What type of Presidential candidate is that inconsiderate as to laugh at questions directed towards another candidate?

The attempted manipulation portrayed at the debate continued throughout the ‘Hannity and Combs’ broadcast as well. First, when the results for the cell phone text messaging poll were announced live on the air, Hannity could be heard screaming out “Oh you’ve got to be kidding me, this is driving me crazy”, then he resorted to the claim that Ron Paul supporters were calling multiple times. What type of infotainment journalism is this? Furthermore, the phone system wouldn’t allow multiple votes from the same telephone number. Hannity’s claim was a lie and he should make a public apology for disrespecting last night’s viewers. We don’t appreciate this host criticizing a very American belief that we are fighting an endless, pointless war and we need to come home. Apparently over 33% of the viewers from last night felt the same way. Why is this so hard to believe and/or understand?

But the disrespect didn’t stop with that comment. ‘Hannity and Combs’ invited all of the candidates as guests after the debate. Each guest on stage was treated with respect and dignity. They were posed questions and allowed to answer questions. Dr. Paul however was chastised and hassled by a very confrontational host when he appeared on stage. Dr. Paul was not even allowed to answer a single question without being hammered by Sean Hannity. Fox News actually had to cut away from Hannity to allow the interview to continue with a more reserved and more professional Combs, but that didn’t stop Sean Hannity from bursting in with “Oh I just have to ask this question…..” as he continued to argue with Dr. Paul. Fox News had no other option but to cut to commercial after only a very short time.

The attempt by this organization and its proprietors to sway the election in their favor is unethical and should be construed as nothing less than attempted voter manipulation. Fox News appears in tens of millions of homes across the nation and they should not be allowed to continue this very ‘unfair and unbalanced’ manipulation of the United States Presidential election.

Ron Paul won the poll last night by a land slide. And when asked by the host of the guests in the New Hampshire restaurant how many patrons were disappointed with Giuliani’s performance, most, if not all raised their hands. Where is any of this newsworthy information on the FoxNews.com website? It’s no where to be found. The current front page image is an edited picture that shows McCain, Romney, Giuliani and Fred Thompson, a candidate that wasn’t even a part of last nights debates. Why does Fox News feel as though they can dictate the next American president to the American people?

Based on the previous biased towards certain candidates, I now call on Fox News to end their blatant favoritism towards Rudy Giuliani and Fred Thompson. It is clear that the American people are not interested in an individual with poor family values, poor economical sense, a false sense of liberty, a dead-beat dad attitude and poor leadership qualities in a commanding position in our nations top Office. I also call on Fox News to live up to their claim of ‘Fair and Balanced’ and provide an equal amount of air time towards Dr. Paul and the other non-mainstream media candidates. It’s not up to Fox News to decide who the Presidential candidates will be; it’s up to the American people.

Finally, I call on Fox News to end their relationship with Sean Hannity. This individual is a horrible example of biased reporting and it is very obvious that he is unable to control his own emotional opinion when he sits before a guest (and a nationwide audience) with whom he may not agree. There is absolutely no excuse for a host of a show to disrespect, dishonor and slander a Presidential hopeful as was done during the New Hampshire debate.

Wednesday night was a horrible demonstration of yet another blatant attempt at manipulation and I call on Fox News to end this sort of behavior immediately. I encourage all Fox News employees to vote in this upcoming election, but not to use your widely broadcast news organization in an attempt to sway uninformed Americans towards a specific candidate who will be just as unpopular as the current President. It’s not your election to choose, Fox News. “You Choose 2008” is directed towards the American people, not the Fox Network.

After the debate, viewers could text in their vote as to who won the debate. When Ron Paul dominated with 35% of the vote, Fox tried to play it off that it was just a small group of Ron Paul supporters texting over and over again on their phones. However, it was not possible to vote more than once!

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/september2007/060907_hannity_lies.htm

From the perversion that was the Fox News coverage of the debate, you would have thought that the crowd was booing Ron Paul (@ 4:55) when he spoke about the neo-cons and their ill-headed strategy of war with Iraq (that I’ve been against since Fall 2002) and his suggestion that we should immediately leave. The boos came out of nowhere. However, I figured it out. There was a big screen TV for people at the debate and they flashed Guiliani’s face up on it for a few seconds when Ron Paul made his final point. The tricksters at Fox news knew some people would boo Guiliani being on the screen and that people watching at home would think the boos were directed at Ron Paul, because the camera didn’t pan backwards to show the big screen. This was the first time they paneled two separate people on the large TV screen that night. In this case, it was Giuliani and Ron Paul and the interesting part was that Giuliani kept smirking as if he knew about it. Further, it was obvious, being the audiophile that I am, that whenever Ron Paul got cheers and an applause, a slight fade from loud to nominal occured. Propaganda at its best.

Again, the crowd wasn’t (mostly anyway) booing Ron Paul; they were booing Fox News’s decision to put up Gestapo Rude’s face on the split monitor. OR it may have been Wallace (the moderator) actually getting boo’d for asking the dumb question “Do you take your marching orders from Al Queda?”, to which Ron Paul responded with, “I take my marching orders from the Constitution”, which received an uproar of applause.

There was so much cheering for Paul during his speech leading up to this question, and then booing as soon as Wallace asked the follow-up question (and before Paul could respond). (Thanks to John Lavis @ http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/ for the video.)

How the crowd really sounded when Ron Paul walked on stage. Not altered by the Fox control center:

Proof of MySpace Censoring Ron Paul Supporters. BTW, Myspace is owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation, which also owns Fox News.

http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/01/09/1135209

Other News:

Ron Paul Wins Maryland Straw Poll!

http://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/stories/2007/09/03/daily17.html

In Spite Of Tyranny at the Texas Straw Poll, Ron Paul still comes in Third!

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/september2007/030907_b_Tyranny.htm

25
Jul

The Story of Mouseland

   Posted by: AUDIOMIND   in Random

It’s the story of a place called Mouseland. Mouseland was a place where all the little mice lived and played, were born and died. And they lived much the same as you and I do.

They even had a Parliament. And every four years they had an election. Used to walk to the polls and cast their ballots. Some of them even got a ride to the polls. And got a ride for the next four years afterwards too. Just like you and me. And every time on election day all the little mice used to go to the ballot box and they used to elect a government. A government made up of big, fat, black cats.

Now if you think it strange that mice should elect a government made up of cats, you just look at the history of Canada for last 90 years and maybe you’ll see that they weren’t any stupider than we are.

Now I’m not saying anything against the cats. They were nice fellows. They conducted their government with dignity. They passed good laws–that is, laws that were good for cats. But the laws that were good for cats weren’t very good for mice. One of the laws said that mouseholes had to be big enough so a cat could get his paw in. Another law said that mice could only travel at certain speeds–so that a cat could get his breakfast without too much effort.

All the laws were good laws. For cats. But, oh, they were hard on the mice. And life was getting harder and harder. And when the mice couldn’t put up with it any more, they decided something had to be done about it. So they went en masse to the polls. They voted the black cats out. They put in the white cats.

Now the white cats had put up a terrific campaign. They said: “All that Mouseland needs is more vision.” They said:”The trouble with Mouseland is those round mouseholes we got. If you put us in we’ll establish square mouseholes.” And they did. And the square mouseholes were twice as big as the round mouseholes, and now the cat could get both his paws in. And life was tougher than ever.

And when they couldn’t take that anymore, they voted the white cats out and put the black ones in again. Then they went back to the white cats. Then to the black cats. They even tried half black cats and half white cats. And they called that coalition. They even got one government made up of cats with spots on them: they were cats that tried to make a noise like a mouse but ate like a cat.

You see, my friends, the trouble wasn’t with the colour of the cat. The trouble was that they were cats. And because they were cats, they naturally looked after cats instead of mice.

Presently there came along one little mouse who had an idea. My friends, watch out for the little fellow with an idea. And he said to the other mice, “Look fellows, why do we keep on electing a government made up of cats? Why don’t we elect a government made up of mice?” “Oh,” they said, “he’s a Bolshevik. Lock him up!” So they put him in jail.

But I want to remind you: that you can lock up a mouse or a man but you can’t lock up an idea.

http://www.saskndp.com/history/mouseland.html

7
May

Right vs. Left vs 3rd Parties

   Posted by: AUDIOMIND   in Random


“I’ll show you politics in America. Here it is, right here. I think the puppet on the right shares my beliefs. I think the puppet on the left is more to my liking. Hey, wait a minute, there’s one guy holding out both puppets!”

– Bill Hicks

If you’re not voting third party, you’re wasting your vote.

If you don’t vote what you believe, you’ll never get what you want.

The people elect the government they deserve.

Two options is only one more than they had in the Soviet Union.

Every November the same party wins: the Politician Party.

A vote for the lesser of two evils is still a vote for evil.

It amazes me that for all the talk of reform and eliminating corruption in government, no one ever addresses the fundamental issue: lack of choices, which is caused directly by our (plurality) voting method. Give non-Dem/Rep voices a fair and equal chance to discuss and promote the merits of their platform instead of dismissing them outright. This means changing the voting system to something that doesn’t predetermine the “leading two”. Anything other than this is a charade. “They” don’t care who wins, because it’s still one of “them”. The real danger (in “their” minds) is if an outsider were to get in and shake things up. Yes, the past 6 years have really demonstrated the truth in “not a dime’s worth of difference”. Who would have thought that a member of the “party of Reagan” would preside over the largest budget increase in history? Both parties want bigger government, so they can curtail your rights – whether they grab them from the left or the right makes no difference in the end.

<=====>
*EDIT*

In response to a recent comment…..

  • Congress is a product of the people.
  • Congress is a product of a process controlled by the political parties. The political parties are in turn controlled by monied and powerful interests who let the parties know who they will back, and who they will not. The parties pick from candidates that can get backing, of course, otherwise they will be picking candidates who cannot advertise, campaign and travel freely – in other words, losing candidates. Once acceptable candidates are chosen, then they let the people vote on which one of these hand-picked people is to continue in the (very, very expensive) process. Once elected, carrying out any promises made during the political campaign is strictly optional.

    In this way, congress (and the senate, and the presidency) end up being 100% made up of people selected by those same monied and powerful interests. “The people” do not control the type of person, or the obligations of that person. Once in power, the usual currency of politics – being supported to run again by the party, junkets, “fact-finding” trips, dinners, appointments to powerful committees, visits to the white house, campaign contributions, rubbing elbows with the powerful, pork for their district, commitments for speaking engagements, returning as a lobbyist, employment at a think tank, tips on everything from stocks to escorts – these, and more, are the “currency” of “elected” government service. It also doesn’t hurt to remember Orwell’s assertion that “the purpose of power – is power.”

    Aside from those people, there is a vast army of unelected, but very powerful individuals who manipulate our daily lives with absolutely no requirement to, or evidence of electing to, pay any attention to public input or subject to public accountability. Not that such input is lacking; they just don’t listen. Examples abound; the FCC with its censorship and pandering to the rich for broadcast (broadcast speech belongs to the rich – period), the FDA with its holding back of therapies even to those who are about to die, the US park service which takes homes from people by force (eminent domain), the Supreme Court with its topsy-turvy interpretation of the commerce clause, disingenuous support for ex post facto laws, craven ducking of religion, and of course, just generally trampling the constitution left and right. And of course, this is just the tip of the iceberg.

    So when you talk about the government – any of it – as being “the people” – you’re speaking of a situation that doesn’t exist in the United States of America. Our federal and state governments are operating broadly outside the bounds of its constitutional authority, within a cycle that is entirely controlled by special interests who have money and power. There are absolutely no signs that this situation is going to change.

    You may wonder why free speech is allowed with GovCo gone so catastrophically wrong. The answer is simple: It is far better for them to let you vent than it is have you smolder and suddenly show up on some politician’s doorstep with what used to be your second amendment rights in hand. Between that and making sure you achieve a general level of complacency, while being distracted by the current round of boogeymen (Terrorists! Pedophiles! Immigrants! Global Warming!), they can keep the population from getting out of hand, even as they trample constitutional rights, engage in broad repression of personal, victimless choices, and pursue military adventures on sovereign foreign soil for the benefit of industry.

    19
    Mar

    Getting Your Government Files by Filing FOIA Requests

       Posted by: AUDIOMIND   in Random

    http://www.sunshineweek.org/
    ‘March 11 marked the start of America’s third annual Sunshine Wee, a national effort to cast light onto the growing recesses of government secrecy’.

    US News is offering up the latest information on the Freedom of Information Act, with links to filing FOI requests to US states, the federal government, and 67 other countries.

    “Often the records can be obtained by simply asking for them, but since 9/11, federal agencies have grown increasingly stubborn about what they release. A just-released survey by the National Security Archive found that only 1 in 5 federal agencies meets congressionally mandated requirements for online information access. There’s hope, though: A new bill is making its way through the House of Representatives, with bipartisan backing, that would strengthen the FOIA, one of a host of open government measures being looked at by the new Congress.”

    Here’s an online guide to getting what the government’s got:

    • The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press has an easy-to-use FOI letter generator, for general requests under the Freedom of Information Act.
    • For an individual’s files, people should make requests under the Privacy Act. Here are relevant forms from the Freedom of Information Center at the University of Missouri’s School of Journalism.
    • Although access varies, every state now has open meetings or open records laws. The Reporters Committee has a handy guide on this, too.

    The question you should be asking yourself is this……
    “If I do happen upon a FOIA request, to any of the number of governmental agencies, will by inference this cause my file to expand?”

    16
    Jan

    My Social Philosophy

       Posted by: AUDIOMIND   in Random

    The nature of government past and present tends toward eternal scope creep. If Libertarians were to sweep all 3 branches of the US government tomorrow and hold power for a decade, we would still not live in a system that actually *had* zero regulation of businesses, complete abandonment of any sort of social safety net, or total privatization of all that is currently in the civic sphere.

    Despite my heavy Libertarian sympathies, I do believe that some things *belong* in the public sector. The Libertarian philosophy may appear extreme to you, and it may in fact be extreme. However, Democrats and Republicans alike have lost sight of any sort of sane boundaries on what belongs in the public sector. I can’t imagine a pure Libertarian philosophy ever really being actualized, but I think an extreme dose of it would bring sobriety and balance to bear against government’s inexorable tendency to intrude further and further into what should be the private sphere.

    Think about it – you surely can see extremity of some sort in the Democrat and Republican parties alike, no? But does this country look entirely like an incarnation of the desires of either one of them? No; it’s a hodge-podge of policies — sometimes contradictory — hailing from all over the political spectrum. So in the end, infusing the system with a bunch of anti-scope-creep politicians would merely introduce some friction to retard the expansion. Like any other party, if they took it too far, populism would push the pendulum of power away from them and things would drift back in the other direction.

    Page 1 of 11