In the era of terrorism, natural disasters and high gas prices, one argumentative approach that comes to mind, [and one that most people might understand] is the “economic argument” that concerns the battle involving the well-being, custody, welfare and visitation of children within the dilapidated family court system. Considering such, if something tends to affects the judge’s pocketbook [or anyone for that matter], then they might tend to listen more closely.
A hypothetical example goes like this:
Using the laws of statistics, sooner or later, a disgruntled father or mother that is being alienated from their children will behave badly. If this bad behavior results in a major terror event, the insurance industry will analyze the event and assign a new “risk premium.” I call it the PARP, Parental Alienation Risk Premium.
If this bad behavior results in a major terror event such as a bombing, dirty bombing, terror plasmid release, hidden radiation release, [etc, you can think of more I bet!] or other nasty form of terror, who pays? …………certainly not the insurance company.
NO, No, this new risk premium is added into the new higher price of property, casualty, and life insurance.
Who pays then?
We all do.
Local, County, State and the Nation.
Down the road all insurance companies will eventually adapt these new risk premiums.
That is why I argue in favor of better-trained judges who can follow the law and fully explain its application. I would like to see all weak judges and magistrates who rely on GALs and social workers, to be retrained, or kicked off the bench.
Will you listen to the cost of negligence?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>……..
————————–
in other news………….
Northlake Mall Just Opened……
http://www.charlotte.com/multimedia/charlotte/KRT_packages/archive/pan/20050914_northlake/northlake1.mov
Now I get to look forward to more traffic going into work and leaving……WHEN will the senseless urban sprawl in Charlotte ever end?!?!?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>…….
————————-
in other news…………
http://blogsearch.google.com/